Dugan & Lopatka Blog

Lower My Taxes! Lower My Taxes!

A few months back, some public sector employees held a protest rally in Springfield, Illinois.

Among other things, they chanted “Raise my taxes! Raise my taxes!”

Many of us in the private sector were taken aback by the protest. We favor lower taxes, not higher taxes. And less government regulation, not more government regulation.

You can hear the “raise my taxes!” chant on the WLS AM radio website at: http://images.radcity.net/5149/4271786.mp3

And you can also download it as a ringtone from the Don Wade & Roma Ringtone Gallery at

http://www.wlsam.com/article.asp?id=1780775 .

A word of warning: the site also has some uncensored Rod and Patti Blagojevich ringtones from the tapes played by the prosecution at the Blago trial.

As we said, we’re for lower taxes. And we’re all for tax planning strategies that lower personal and business tax liabilities.

The Legal Right of a Taxpayer….

“…to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes, or altogether avoid them, by means which the law permits, cannot be doubted.”

Gregory vs. Helvering ,293 U.S. 465,  55 Supreme Court Reporter 266

Well said.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 29, 2010, 10:59 am  | Trackback

Memo to Congress: Please Connect the Dots

  • Most small business owners are organized as proprietorships, partnerships, LLCs or “S Corporations”.
  • That means the business income is taxed on the owners’ personal returns at the individual tax rates.
  • According to the IRS, about two thirds of all U.S. corporations operate as S corporations (http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=212389,00.html).
  • The number of partnerships and LLCs increased to more than 3 million in 2007, according to the IRS Fall 2009 Statistics of Income Bulletin (http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=215809,00.html).
  • The June national unemployment rate stands at 9.5% according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm).
  • Small business has generated 64% of net new jobs over the past 15 years according to the SBA (http://web.sba.gov/faqs/faqIndexAll.cfm?areaid=24).
  • Raising individual income taxes on small business leaves small firms with less money to hire new employees.
  • So now’s not the time to raise taxes on small business.
  • Please reread the above and connect the dots.

 

P.S.  To find out what the current income tax rates are on small business, check out the inside page of our Handy Tax Guide at

http://www.duganlopatka.com/images/PDF/handytax2010.pdf

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 28, 2010, 8:47 am  | Trackback

Now’s Not the Time to Raise Taxes on Small Business

Today’s Quiz:

Q1.  Do you have “household income” over $250,000?

Q2.  If yes, do you feel “wealthy”?

If you answered “yes” to the first question, but “no” to the second, you may be a small business owner.

Congress continues the debate to raise taxes next year on the “wealthy”. Their definition of wealthy seems to be families with “household income” over $250,000.

And that could be a jobs killer.  

A 2009 report from the U.S. Small Business Administration tells us that small firms represent 99.7% of all employer firms, employ over 50% of all private sector employees and have generated 64% of net new jobs over the past 15 years.

Where are we going with this?

Most small business owners are organized as proprietorships, partnerships, LLCs or “S Corporations”. That means the business income is taxed on the owners’ personal returns at the individual tax rates.

So that “household income” over $250,000 may actually be from a small business.

Raising taxes leaves less for small business to invest, whether it’s investment in new equipment, new technologies or new hires.

So why raise taxes on small business with unemployment near 10%?

Our PSA to Congress tomorrow.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 27, 2010, 11:09 am  | Trackback

Tax Chatter on the Rise

The tax “chatter” is picking up in Washington. 

President Obama is still on record for a 20% capital gains tax rate next year. That compares to the current 15% rate, a 33% increase.

And the President favors letting the “Bush tax cuts” expire for those with “household income” over $250,000. That would raise the top two brackets from 33% to 36% and 35% to 39.6%.

Treasury Secretary Geithner echoed the President’s sentiments in comments late last week and on the weekend news shows. 

On the other hand, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke favors keeping the Bush tax cuts to help a faltering economy. Bernanke made the comments last week in his appearance before the House Financial Services Committee.

It’s not clear when Congress might take up the matter with election year politics in the mix. The August recess starts August 9, and the House isn’t scheduled to return until Monday, September 13.

The “target adjournment” date is October 8. That doesn’t leave many working days left to get things done before the November election.

So we may see a ”lame duck” session after the election. That happens in even numbered years when Congress has “unfinished legislation” after the normal adjournment.

That includes a tax bill.

It’s unlikely Congress will pass a tax bill by the end of next week.

That leaves a short session before the November election or a lame duck session after the election.

Stay tuned.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 26, 2010, 3:31 pm  | Trackback

A Regulation Avalanche is Coming

Yesterday President Obama signed into law the 2,000 page financial reform bill. In March the President signed the 2,300 page health care bill.

Both bills leave most of the details to others to figure out: the “regulators”.

Generally when tax bills are passed the Treasury Department issues regulations to interpret and administer the newly passed legislation.

The regulations come out first in proposed form. Then there’s a “public comment” period, before the rules are adopted as final.

Sometimes there are revisions to the proposed rules, and then a second set of proposed regulations come out.

That happened back in 1989 when the Treasury Department offered us this:

“If paragraph (f)(4)(iii)(A) of this section applies to a supplier undertaking, the supplier undertaking shall be treated as similar to undertakings that are similar to the recipient undertaking and shall not otherwise be treated as similar to undertakings to which the supplier undertaking would be similar without regard to paragraph (f)(4)(iii) of this section.”   -Treasury Regulation 1.469-4T(f)(4)(iii)(C)(2)

Ouch.

Most of us had real problems with the ’89 regulations, and the government eventually replaced them.

We’ll all be watching closely as the avalanche of proposed regulations start coming out. And no doubt some will go through multiple rewrites, just like back in ‘89. 

You can follow along too. Just check the Federal Register, where the rules are first published:  http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/ .

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 22, 2010, 11:26 am  | Trackback

The Annual SAVE Award – Time is Running Out

Peter Orszag is the current director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

His blog for today notes that time is running out on the second annual SAVE award contest (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/10/07/21/Time-is-Running-out-to-SAVE/).

I had never heard of the SAVE award contest before. Turns out it’s an annual contest where people can summit suggestions on how to cut waste and improve government performance.

The contest ends tomorrow so time’s running short on summiting your ideas.

Problem is, though, the contest is limited to suggestions from government workers. The rest of us are ineligible to compete.

So if you’re a government employee, get those submissions in by tomorrow at http://www.whitehouse.gov/save-award .

If you’re not a government employee and have a good suggestion, well, I’m not sure what you do.

I just tried to register and summit a couple of my ideas, but couldn’t.

I don’t have a recognized “organization issued email address”.

Forget about the contest.

But make sure you submit your ideas and suggestions to your elected officials. You can find yours at http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml .

I think they need our help.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 21, 2010, 4:06 pm  | Trackback

Jobs and The Small Business Summit

Last week the U.S. Chamber of Commerce held its America’s Small Business Summit in Washington D.C. The conference also included a Jobs Summit, as part of the Chamber’s American Free Enterprise Dream Big campaign.

The Summit brings together small business owners, association executives, and state and local chamber executives from across the country.

This year’s speakers included Bob Love, the former Chicago Bulls great and NBA All-Star. Love’s retired jersey hangs from the rafters at the United Center, along with those of Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen and Jerry Sloan.

Love suffered from a severe stuttering problem from childhood, and after his basketball career ended he wound up working as a busboy making $4.45 an hour to support his family.

Thanks to speech therapy classes, today Love is the Director of Community Affairs for the Bulls, regularly speaks to school children, and is a motivational speaker and author.

I didn’t hear Love’s speech at the Summit. But I suspect he talked about perseverance, a positive attitude, and following your dreams. 

See Love talks about following his dreams in his documentary, aptly named “Find Yourself A Dream”.

And that brings us back to the Summit: Dream Big.

Last week the Chamber sent an open letter to the President and the Congress on how to put Americans back to work.

You can find it at  http://www.freeenterprise.com/2010/07/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-u-s-chamber%e2%80%99s-open-letter-to-president-and-congress-offers-plan-to-put-america-back-to-work/

And you can learn more about the Dream Big campaign at http://www.freeenterprise.com/about/

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 19, 2010, 5:16 pm  | Trackback

Whatever Happened to the Federal Estate Tax?

We get this question all the time.

The estate tax was repealed effective January 1, 2010 under the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. The tax also comes back with a vengeance on January 1, 2011 as things now stand.

The federal estate tax exemption was $3,500,000 in 2009, with a top rate of 45%. The exemption drops down to $1,000,000 and the top rate goes up to 55% next year, unless Congress changes the law.

Most commentators expected Congress to extend the estate tax to 2010, possibly with some changes, like an increase in the exemption amount.

But Congress has been sidetracked with healthcare, financial reform and the budget deficit. Plus legislators haven’t been able to reach a consensus on any compromise estate tax bill.

It’s unlikely that a reinstatement would be retroactive to January 1, 2010. But if that does happen, it would no doubt be challenged in the courts.  

It’s hard to plan with the current uncertainty. Nonetheless, there are some important steps to take now in updating your will and trust documents.

We’ll discuss those tomorrow.

In the meantime, the IRS has released a FAQ on the status of the estate tax and related matters which you can find at http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=224519,00.html .

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 12, 2010, 2:58 pm  | Trackback

Long Term Budget Outlook

CBO 300x262 Long Term Budget OutlookLast week the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a new report on the long term budget outlook for the federal government.

The CBO forecast the budget under two scenarios, based on different assumptions for future government policies on tax revenue and spending.

The report shouldn’t surprise anyone who follows what’s going on inside the Beltway. Congress needs to increase taxes “substantially”, decrease spending “significantly” or adopt some combination of the two if lawmakers “are to put the nation on a sustainable budgetary path”.

You can find both the full and summary reports and the Director’s Blog at http://cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=11579

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 9, 2010, 12:37 pm  | Trackback

LeBron James and State Taxes

LeBron James delivers his Address to the Nation tonight on ESPN. Many sports commentators are now saying it’s a toss up between Cleveland and Miami.

Of course, we’d love to see LeBron come to the Chicago Bulls, and join Derrick Rose, Joakim Noah and newly signed Carlos Boozer.

Last night a Chicago T V station reported that LeBron had changed his “tax address” to Illinois according to unnamed sources.

I hope that’s true, but I doubt it. He might pick the Bulls, but it’s unlikely he’d declare his state of residency before he makes his announcement tonight.

Many people change their state of residency for tax purposes. And Florida is a popular choice since the state doesn’t have a personal income tax.

Illinois has a flat 3% personal income tax rate, although Governor Quinn would like to raise it to 4%.

Ohio has graduated rates that top out at 6.24% this year and 5.925% next year.

If LeBron listens to his tax advisors he’ll head south to the Miami Heat and join DeWyane Wade and Chris Bosh.

But there are a lot more business opportunities for LeBron if he comes to Chicago. And those Jordanesque opportunities would likely outweigh the Illinois tax hit.

Of course, LeBron is from Akron so he may stay put in Cleveland. The Cavs can also offer LeBron the biggest contract under NBA rules. But, he’s got those high Ohio tax rates to consider.

We’ll find out tonight.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 8, 2010, 8:11 am  | Trackback
Older Posts »

Dugan & Lopatka, CPAs, PC   104 E. Roosevelt Rd., Wheaton, Illinois 60187    Phone: (630) 665-4440    Fax: (630) 665-5030