Dugan & Lopatka Blog

Lower My Taxes! Lower My Taxes!

A few months back, some public sector employees held a protest rally in Springfield, Illinois.

Among other things, they chanted “Raise my taxes! Raise my taxes!”

Many of us in the private sector were taken aback by the protest. We favor lower taxes, not higher taxes. And less government regulation, not more government regulation.

You can hear the “raise my taxes!” chant on the WLS AM radio website at: http://images.radcity.net/5149/4271786.mp3

And you can also download it as a ringtone from the Don Wade & Roma Ringtone Gallery at

http://www.wlsam.com/article.asp?id=1780775 .

A word of warning: the site also has some uncensored Rod and Patti Blagojevich ringtones from the tapes played by the prosecution at the Blago trial.

As we said, we’re for lower taxes. And we’re all for tax planning strategies that lower personal and business tax liabilities.

The Legal Right of a Taxpayer….

“…to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes, or altogether avoid them, by means which the law permits, cannot be doubted.”

Gregory vs. Helvering ,293 U.S. 465,  55 Supreme Court Reporter 266

Well said.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 29, 2010, 10:59 am  | Trackback

Memo to Congress: Please Connect the Dots

  • Most small business owners are organized as proprietorships, partnerships, LLCs or “S Corporations”.
  • That means the business income is taxed on the owners’ personal returns at the individual tax rates.
  • According to the IRS, about two thirds of all U.S. corporations operate as S corporations (http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=212389,00.html).
  • The number of partnerships and LLCs increased to more than 3 million in 2007, according to the IRS Fall 2009 Statistics of Income Bulletin (http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=215809,00.html).
  • The June national unemployment rate stands at 9.5% according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm).
  • Small business has generated 64% of net new jobs over the past 15 years according to the SBA (http://web.sba.gov/faqs/faqIndexAll.cfm?areaid=24).
  • Raising individual income taxes on small business leaves small firms with less money to hire new employees.
  • So now’s not the time to raise taxes on small business.
  • Please reread the above and connect the dots.

 

P.S.  To find out what the current income tax rates are on small business, check out the inside page of our Handy Tax Guide at

http://www.duganlopatka.com/images/PDF/handytax2010.pdf

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 28, 2010, 8:47 am  | Trackback

Now’s Not the Time to Raise Taxes on Small Business

Today’s Quiz:

Q1.  Do you have “household income” over $250,000?

Q2.  If yes, do you feel “wealthy”?

If you answered “yes” to the first question, but “no” to the second, you may be a small business owner.

Congress continues the debate to raise taxes next year on the “wealthy”. Their definition of wealthy seems to be families with “household income” over $250,000.

And that could be a jobs killer.  

A 2009 report from the U.S. Small Business Administration tells us that small firms represent 99.7% of all employer firms, employ over 50% of all private sector employees and have generated 64% of net new jobs over the past 15 years.

Where are we going with this?

Most small business owners are organized as proprietorships, partnerships, LLCs or “S Corporations”. That means the business income is taxed on the owners’ personal returns at the individual tax rates.

So that “household income” over $250,000 may actually be from a small business.

Raising taxes leaves less for small business to invest, whether it’s investment in new equipment, new technologies or new hires.

So why raise taxes on small business with unemployment near 10%?

Our PSA to Congress tomorrow.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 27, 2010, 11:09 am  | Trackback

Tax Chatter on the Rise

The tax “chatter” is picking up in Washington. 

President Obama is still on record for a 20% capital gains tax rate next year. That compares to the current 15% rate, a 33% increase.

And the President favors letting the “Bush tax cuts” expire for those with “household income” over $250,000. That would raise the top two brackets from 33% to 36% and 35% to 39.6%.

Treasury Secretary Geithner echoed the President’s sentiments in comments late last week and on the weekend news shows. 

On the other hand, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke favors keeping the Bush tax cuts to help a faltering economy. Bernanke made the comments last week in his appearance before the House Financial Services Committee.

It’s not clear when Congress might take up the matter with election year politics in the mix. The August recess starts August 9, and the House isn’t scheduled to return until Monday, September 13.

The “target adjournment” date is October 8. That doesn’t leave many working days left to get things done before the November election.

So we may see a ”lame duck” session after the election. That happens in even numbered years when Congress has “unfinished legislation” after the normal adjournment.

That includes a tax bill.

It’s unlikely Congress will pass a tax bill by the end of next week.

That leaves a short session before the November election or a lame duck session after the election.

Stay tuned.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 26, 2010, 3:31 pm  | Trackback

A Regulation Avalanche is Coming

Yesterday President Obama signed into law the 2,000 page financial reform bill. In March the President signed the 2,300 page health care bill.

Both bills leave most of the details to others to figure out: the “regulators”.

Generally when tax bills are passed the Treasury Department issues regulations to interpret and administer the newly passed legislation.

The regulations come out first in proposed form. Then there’s a “public comment” period, before the rules are adopted as final.

Sometimes there are revisions to the proposed rules, and then a second set of proposed regulations come out.

That happened back in 1989 when the Treasury Department offered us this:

“If paragraph (f)(4)(iii)(A) of this section applies to a supplier undertaking, the supplier undertaking shall be treated as similar to undertakings that are similar to the recipient undertaking and shall not otherwise be treated as similar to undertakings to which the supplier undertaking would be similar without regard to paragraph (f)(4)(iii) of this section.”   -Treasury Regulation 1.469-4T(f)(4)(iii)(C)(2)

Ouch.

Most of us had real problems with the ’89 regulations, and the government eventually replaced them.

We’ll all be watching closely as the avalanche of proposed regulations start coming out. And no doubt some will go through multiple rewrites, just like back in ‘89. 

You can follow along too. Just check the Federal Register, where the rules are first published:  http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/ .

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 22, 2010, 11:26 am  | Trackback

The Annual SAVE Award – Time is Running Out

Peter Orszag is the current director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

His blog for today notes that time is running out on the second annual SAVE award contest (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/10/07/21/Time-is-Running-out-to-SAVE/).

I had never heard of the SAVE award contest before. Turns out it’s an annual contest where people can summit suggestions on how to cut waste and improve government performance.

The contest ends tomorrow so time’s running short on summiting your ideas.

Problem is, though, the contest is limited to suggestions from government workers. The rest of us are ineligible to compete.

So if you’re a government employee, get those submissions in by tomorrow at http://www.whitehouse.gov/save-award .

If you’re not a government employee and have a good suggestion, well, I’m not sure what you do.

I just tried to register and summit a couple of my ideas, but couldn’t.

I don’t have a recognized “organization issued email address”.

Forget about the contest.

But make sure you submit your ideas and suggestions to your elected officials. You can find yours at http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml .

I think they need our help.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 21, 2010, 4:06 pm  | Trackback

Jobs and The Small Business Summit

Last week the U.S. Chamber of Commerce held its America’s Small Business Summit in Washington D.C. The conference also included a Jobs Summit, as part of the Chamber’s American Free Enterprise Dream Big campaign.

The Summit brings together small business owners, association executives, and state and local chamber executives from across the country.

This year’s speakers included Bob Love, the former Chicago Bulls great and NBA All-Star. Love’s retired jersey hangs from the rafters at the United Center, along with those of Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen and Jerry Sloan.

Love suffered from a severe stuttering problem from childhood, and after his basketball career ended he wound up working as a busboy making $4.45 an hour to support his family.

Thanks to speech therapy classes, today Love is the Director of Community Affairs for the Bulls, regularly speaks to school children, and is a motivational speaker and author.

I didn’t hear Love’s speech at the Summit. But I suspect he talked about perseverance, a positive attitude, and following your dreams. 

See Love talks about following his dreams in his documentary, aptly named “Find Yourself A Dream”.

And that brings us back to the Summit: Dream Big.

Last week the Chamber sent an open letter to the President and the Congress on how to put Americans back to work.

You can find it at  http://www.freeenterprise.com/2010/07/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-u-s-chamber%e2%80%99s-open-letter-to-president-and-congress-offers-plan-to-put-america-back-to-work/

And you can learn more about the Dream Big campaign at http://www.freeenterprise.com/about/

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 19, 2010, 5:16 pm  | Trackback

More on Estate Planning for 2010

We said it yesterday, the waiting is over and now is the time to review your existing will and trust documents.

A “contingent” formula clause is the best way to avoid unintended results on how estate assets are allocated. 

So called “disclaimers” are another way to “fix” estate plans to avoid unintended consequences. Disclaimers can be complicated, and you need to cover that with a good estate planning attorney.

Here are some other things to consider as well.

Don’t forget that many states still have a state inheritance tax. The state inheritance tax not only applies to residents in those states, but also to anyone who owns property in a state with an inheritance tax.

We also have new “basis” rules on inherited property for income tax purpose. As the law currently stands, an heir will now recognize capital gain on the sale of inherited assets, based on the decedent’s “cost basis” in the asset. 

That cost basis is generally the amount that was originally paid for the asset, regardless of how along it was purchased.  Good luck trying to find out Mom or Dad’s cost basis on stock purchased 10, 20 or 30 years ago.

There is a new limited $1.3 million “step-up” election for non spousal transfers. The step up effectively reduces the amount subject to capital gains taxes when the asset is eventually sold.

And there’s an additional $3 million basis adjustment available for property inherited by a spouse.

It’s important to plan for how the limited $1.3 million “allowable basis adjustment” is allocated among estate assets, and that’s something you should address with your tax advisors.

We’ll see what eventually happens with the estate tax and the new basis rules.

But now’s the time for “contingency planning” to make sure you avoid unintended results and maximize after tax inheritances.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 15, 2010, 3:52 pm  | Trackback

It’s Time to Update Your Estate Plans

Many people have taken a “wait and see” approach to estate planning this year, expecting Congress to reinstate the estate tax.

It hasn’t happened yet, and it looks like it won’t happen anytime soon. Congress has a full plate, and limited working days left before it’s back on the campaign trail.

That means the waiting is over and now’s the time to update your existing will and trust documents.

Most estate plans use “formula clauses” to allocate estate assets to trusts and other beneficiaries. And these formula clauses are generally tied to the estate tax and the estate tax exemption amount.

The repeal of the estate tax can change how estate assets are allocated and cause unintended results. And some beneficiaries might be inadvertently “disinherited” while others receive unintended windfalls.

Without a “fix”, the surviving spouse or marital trust might receive everything or nothing, depending on the drafting language. Or the family trust could receive everything or nothing.

A “contingent” formula clause is the best way to avoid these unintended results.

The concept goes like this:

If there is no estate tax, then allocate the estate assets this way. If there is an estate tax, then allocate the estate assets this way.

This is a Big Time oversimplification, but you get the idea.

Like we said, the waiting is over and now is the time to update your exisiting will and trust documents.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 14, 2010, 5:35 am  | Trackback

Whatever Happened to the Federal Estate Tax?

We get this question all the time.

The estate tax was repealed effective January 1, 2010 under the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. The tax also comes back with a vengeance on January 1, 2011 as things now stand.

The federal estate tax exemption was $3,500,000 in 2009, with a top rate of 45%. The exemption drops down to $1,000,000 and the top rate goes up to 55% next year, unless Congress changes the law.

Most commentators expected Congress to extend the estate tax to 2010, possibly with some changes, like an increase in the exemption amount.

But Congress has been sidetracked with healthcare, financial reform and the budget deficit. Plus legislators haven’t been able to reach a consensus on any compromise estate tax bill.

It’s unlikely that a reinstatement would be retroactive to January 1, 2010. But if that does happen, it would no doubt be challenged in the courts.  

It’s hard to plan with the current uncertainty. Nonetheless, there are some important steps to take now in updating your will and trust documents.

We’ll discuss those tomorrow.

In the meantime, the IRS has released a FAQ on the status of the estate tax and related matters which you can find at http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=224519,00.html .

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted by Jerry Lopatka on July 12, 2010, 2:58 pm  | Trackback
Older Posts »

Dugan & Lopatka, CPAs, PC   104 E. Roosevelt Rd., Wheaton, Illinois 60187    Phone: (630) 665-4440    Fax: (630) 665-5030